|
<basically her main criticism
was
that we need more UN involvement. >
another reason I can't
stand her. The UN is useless and should be treated as such.
^**^Bethany^**^
^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^**^
"Keep
American out of the liberal toilet.
Vote Bush-Cheney in
2004"
|
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:21
AM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Were Hillary's
Words Treasonous?
OK... I read a few more reports... basically her main
criticism was
that we need more UN involvement. She thinks that Bush
is
somehow holding it back or messing that up, which is stupid if
you
ask me... Koffe Anan won't even attend the meetings. I bet
he would
if Hillary was the president.
On Tuesday, December 2, 2003, at
06:32 AM, Charles wrote:
> What she said *publicly* was that the
attacks against US interests were
> successful at demoralizing the
troops and if Bush didn't change they
> would
> only get more
successful. That sounds like she is saying they were
> doing
a
> good job to me.
>
>
> Charles Mims
> http://www.the-sandbox.org
>
>
>
-----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Tim
Harder
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:20 AM
> To: The
Sandbox Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Were Hillary's Words
Treasonous?
>
>
>
> She told the terrorists that they
were doing a good job?
>
> <crap, I thought I read that
thing>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 1, 2003,
at 09:54 PM, Charles wrote:
>
>> Here is the problem, or part
of it...
>>
>> The definition of treason involves aid and
comfort to the enemy.
>> Isn't it
>> well within the realm
of plausibility that a Senator (one of the
>> highest offices in our
system) who publicly tells the enemy that they
>> are doing a good
job is crossing that line?
>>
>>
>> Charles
Mims
>> http://www.the-sandbox.org
>>
>>
>>
-----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Tim
Harder
>> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:42 PM
>> To:
The Sandbox Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Were Hillary's
Words Treasonous?
>>
>>
>> OK... good
angle...
>>
>> How 'bout this.... she was a senator ... on a
fact finding mission...
>> she has
>> an opinion...
reporters are sticking microphones in her face asking
>> her
opinion...
>>
>> I thought that she sounded much like any
other politician that might
>> have been in the same
situation...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On
Monday, December 1, 2003, at 09:17 PM, Lowell R. Matthews
wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Harder
wrote:
>>>
>>>> How.... is she
worse?
>>>
>>> She's an elected official of the U.S.
government. Hanoi Jane was an
>>>
actress.
>>>
>>>
---Lowell
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> Sndbox mailing
list
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
>> Sndbox mailing
list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
>> Sndbox mailing
list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> Sndbox mailing
list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> Sndbox mailing
list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
>
_______________________________________________
Sndbox
mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
|
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
