webbsolution Wrote: > Am I reading this post correctly? I was under the impression that 2.4 > was faster not slower than 72mhz and yet you are posting a lower MS > latency for 72 tested scenarios which implies faster respnses.
If you notice that the test equipment used is a stock JR8103 72 mhz with a 2.4 module. It is known that there is no latency improvement with a 72 mhz and 2.4 module. The native mode X9303 2.4 is faster, lets hope the next test will use the latest equipment. sj -- SmokinJoe101 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SmokinJoe101's Profile: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/member.php?u=26572 View this thread: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=856574 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
