webbsolution Wrote: > I think SmokinJoe101 has the most relevant statement here actually. This > detail escaped me. A true 2.4 system has been recorded as faster. Your > test hardware represents only those systems that are upgraded to 2.4 > > Even with a full 2.4 system the differences may be only 30-50 MS > between the two. > > Some would say this is a difference that no one would notice but I > would argue against that concept. These small improvements although > difficult to pick out in a single event translate generally into other > areas that are noticed at a higher level. > > I would like to see the next series of tests with a full 2.4 unit. It > would be interesting to note the differences. Well...that's why there's vanilla and chocolate.
-- Quacker ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quacker's Profile: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/member.php?u=4759 View this thread: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=856574 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
