webbsolution Wrote: > Am I reading this post correctly? I was under the impression that 2.4 > was faster not slower than 72mhz and yet you are posting a lower MS > latency for 72 tested scenarios which implies faster respnses. > > > Also, the difference between say 35 MS and 69 MS is not something I > would easily pass off as undetectable. If you are passing a lot of data > which is likely in the near future this difference will mean quite a lot > if the available bandwidth is anywhere near taxed.
My reference was strictly a comment about the time between pilot input and the start of observable control movement. It was not a comment on data rate or bandwidth. -- Quacker ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quacker's Profile: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/member.php?u=4759 View this thread: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=856574 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
