On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Wade Brainerd <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Martin, > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Martin Dengler <[email protected]> > wrote:
[snip] >> I'm trying to point out that SL had better have an idea of what it >> wants out of SoaS if it wants to invest time in it. So far it seems >> like SL wants to put in (great) marketing and get out a linux distro >> that beats Fedora in hardware and community support. > > I don't understand this point, which seems to be the crux of the issue... > SoaS *is* Fedora. Are there any circumstances where Fedora would work > better than SoaS on target hardware? Further, the work we have been doing at GPA and with other SoaS efforts has provided feedback from real-world situations that will hopefully impact (in a positive way) the efforts at Fedora, Suse, Trisquel and others. It is not so much the size of the deployment as how much we learn from it that matters. -walter > -Wade > > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas > > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
