On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Walter, > >>>> I'm trying to point out that SL had better have an idea of what it >>>> wants out of SoaS if it wants to invest time in it. So far it seems >>>> like SL wants to put in (great) marketing and get out a linux distro >>>> that beats Fedora in hardware and community support. >>> >>> I don't understand this point, which seems to be the crux of the issue... >>> SoaS *is* Fedora. Are there any circumstances where Fedora would work >>> better than SoaS on target hardware? >> >> Further, the work we have been doing at GPA and with other SoaS >> efforts has provided feedback from real-world situations that will >> hopefully impact (in a positive way) the efforts at Fedora, Suse, >> Trisquel and others. It is not so much the size of the deployment as >> how much we learn from it that matters. > > How is that being fed back upstream to Fedora and the other distros. I > must admit due to lack of time I've been mostly ignoring the GPA > emails but I do have other feedback loops and I've not heard how these > 'real-world situations' are improving Fedora. Is there a concise wiki > page I can reference to ensure I can assist in getting these suggested > improvements upstream. > > Peter >
I cannot say for sure that Fedora's Live USB efforts are being influenced by our feedback. Most feedback is getting back to Fedora through Sebastian. Alas, there is not a concise wiki page and there is still a lot of noise in the feedback--something we are working to improve. But what we do have is about 50 kids and teachers using SoaS--mostly with few problems--which is pretty good news. -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
