Hi Walter, >>> I'm trying to point out that SL had better have an idea of what it >>> wants out of SoaS if it wants to invest time in it. So far it seems >>> like SL wants to put in (great) marketing and get out a linux distro >>> that beats Fedora in hardware and community support. >> >> I don't understand this point, which seems to be the crux of the issue... >> SoaS *is* Fedora. Are there any circumstances where Fedora would work >> better than SoaS on target hardware? > > Further, the work we have been doing at GPA and with other SoaS > efforts has provided feedback from real-world situations that will > hopefully impact (in a positive way) the efforts at Fedora, Suse, > Trisquel and others. It is not so much the size of the deployment as > how much we learn from it that matters.
How is that being fed back upstream to Fedora and the other distros. I must admit due to lack of time I've been mostly ignoring the GPA emails but I do have other feedback loops and I've not heard how these 'real-world situations' are improving Fedora. Is there a concise wiki page I can reference to ensure I can assist in getting these suggested improvements upstream. Peter _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
