On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > what is the current status for activity releases in order to include > them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did you > switch over to construct the rpms from the .xo? For example the latest > Paint rpm uses the .xo AFAIK (build even the binaries from the > non-python sources in the bundle). > > And is the email from ASLO enough for packagers to know about new > releases? Any other notification that packagers need?
In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work directly from the git repository. I have cced jonas for an official position. david > Regards, > Simon > > * Of course any other downstreams that package/include activities are > happy to reply to this email too. > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas > _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
