On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14.09.2010, at 23:15, [email protected] wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work >>>> directly from the git repository. >>> >>> Is it not still the practice to put tarballs on download.sl.o ??? >> >> No its not! Sebastian and I got sick of sounding like broken down >> records so I have no idea of the current status. > > Not sure I can parse what you mean. Are you saying it is not current practice > but it should be?
It seems it generally doesn't happen. No idea if its policy or not. > And (from your other msg) why do you want both zip (xo) and tar balls? I just want sure source code only tarfiles. I presume for a.sl.o there's a need for ready to run .xo files which may or may not contain pre compiled binaries. Peter _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
