On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Walter Bender <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include >>> them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did you >>> switch over to construct the rpms from the .xo? For example the latest >>> Paint rpm uses the .xo AFAIK (build even the binaries from the >>> non-python sources in the bundle). >>> >>> And is the email from ASLO enough for packagers to know about new >>> releases? Any other notification that packagers need? >> >> In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work >> directly from the git repository. > > Is it not still the practice to put tarballs on download.sl.o ???
No its not! Sebastian and I got sick of sounding like broken down records so I have no idea of the current status. Peter _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
