On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Farning <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Simon Schampijer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> what is the current status for activity releases in order to include >> them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did you >> switch over to construct the rpms from the .xo? For example the latest >> Paint rpm uses the .xo AFAIK (build even the binaries from the >> non-python sources in the bundle). >> >> And is the email from ASLO enough for packagers to know about new >> releases? Any other notification that packagers need? > > In the .deb side of the universe, we prefer tarballs but we can work > directly from the git repository.
Is it not still the practice to put tarballs on download.sl.o ??? -walter > > I have cced jonas for an official position. > > david > >> Regards, >> Simon >> >> * Of course any other downstreams that package/include activities are >> happy to reply to this email too. >> _______________________________________________ >> SoaS mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas >> > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
