At 04:14 PM 9/28/2007, you wrote: >I worked up a quick graphic with some icons that we >made...http://www.wlanmall.com/images/muniwifi.jpg.
Nice image. What I would add, for reliability, is the two remote bridge antennas going to the cloud, should also connect to each other, so there are always two routes to the cloud, in case one goes down. Otherwise, the Terms Of Service needs some "outage" clauses? I'd prefer each MESH to have triple net connections, and preferably to different cloud connections, on separate power grids. I do believe that is a concept already inside of the MESH concept. >Now on another note, my feeling is that the only way you can viably >deploy a muni-mesh network is to get public safety and muni utilities >to become the major users of the network. This means five 9's for public safety to "depend" on your build out. Meaning significant start up capital. I'd like to see that happen. I'm thinking the city might be considering that. I'd like the city to consider more than just this one method, and allow smaller operators to hook up. A city MESH might be done in a month that way with full coverage over all of LA. It would not be a five 9's network, but it could grow into one. But, there are no cash boondoggles for firms on tax payers coat tails that way. >Just my 2 cents...Have a good weekend. Continue posting Ronen! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SOCALWUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SOCALWUG SOCALWUG website: http://www.socalwug.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
