On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:48:34 -0700 Pawel Aleksander Fedorynski <pfe...@gmail.com> wrote:
PAF> I'm curious, why did you decide not to use the code I suggested for PAF> backends/mysql/statement.cpp? I'm sorry, I simply misread the changes in your message. I meant to do exactly what you suggested but clearly messed things up -- and didn't notice it because the tests still passed. PAF> All of FIELD_TYPE_CHAR, FIELD_TYPE_SHORT and FIELD_TYPE_INT24 should PAF> fit in four bytes no matter whether they're signed or unsigned, so why PAF> not just identify them as dt_integer? No reason at all. PAF> Do you have any objection to me changing it to the version I proposed PAF> in this thread? No, not at all, please go ahead -- or I can fix it if you prefer. Sorry again for misapplying your changes, VZ
pgpkIpHk6ovUF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ Soci-users mailing list Soci-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soci-users
