On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 18:49 -0400, kipster wrote: > ill read more posts from Chad as I'm new to the forum,
That explains it then. When you have been subjected to Chad's behaviour for a few years, your tolerance might wane. The problem is that we get more and more new subscribers on this list like yourself. If Chad is allowed to continue his disruption its simply bad for the project. Ok, we all have some heated discussions from time to time and disagreements. Some people say things at in haste and then regret it and apologise and we all then get on together. Its a matter of line drawing and I think the longer serving members of the group are saying Chad has stepped over the line once too often. > not entirely > convinced Ooo is the wave of the future, and because im a sociable person > who depends on input from those who know more than I to help me formulate > viable opinions. Intelligent argument is fine to test views, no one is against that. > if I feel assaulted or pushed by anyone (bullied?), I will > probably just move on with a killfile rather than fighting any battles. I > didn't join this list to fight, but instead, to learn. And with that attitude you probably will :-) -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMSL
