Hi Bill,

Thanks. Yes I know it will do that but I have my computer that I use for
Linrad/Winrad/
Spectran/FFTDSP and that computer has 2 sound cards. I believe
DSPBlaster nor
FFTDSP are able to handle that situation at least not in my case as far
as I know.

That's why I have another machine with just a genuine sandblaster in it.

Also I might not have the latest version, as a matter of fact,  I do not
have the latest.

Perhaps that's the reason  Yes indeed I can use  DOS under  windows to
run dspblaster
but I don't think one does have that option in WIN2000/NT /XP?

BTW I had a typo in the W3SZ URL it is:

  http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz/

73  Rein W6/PA0ZN


bill_w4zv wrote:

>--- In [email protected], "Rein A. Smit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>

>
>>I believe the software is still available. And it has been updated with
>>a waterfall display. However the problem is, it needs a genuine
>>sound card  and will run only under DOS. I have an older version here
>>and one needs to have the sound card installed and a possible
>>on board sound card disabled. And running DOS.
>>I have a dedicated  old machine here just to run DSPBlaster
>>   
>>
>
>Rein, this is not necessary.  DSP Blaster switches very cleanly
>between Windows and DOS.  Typically I have Windows programs such as a
>browser/email/spam filter open, click on the DSP Blaster icon beneath
>my screen and everything switches instantly to the DSP Blaster screen.
> When I want to switch back, I click "Exit" on the DSP screen, and
>everything in my previous Windows screen returns, just as it was.  Of
>course you cannot have both DSP Blaster and Windows open
>simultaneously but the transition is seamless (at least I felt 1 click
>to transition was quite reasonable).
>

>
>>A while ago I compared here Winrad to DSPBlaster and could not
>>really find much difference in detection limits. Also tried DSP blaster
>>after Winrad processing and that was better but not very practical.
>>( One soundcard's output into another on the DOS machine. )
>>I was mainly interested to see which of  the 2 packages is better
>>to detect audio just above the niose where the trace is visible but no
>>audio is detectable other than noise
>>   
>>
>
>Thanks for the interesting comments.  I would like to try Winrad but
>have not been successful thus far (maybe due to computer speed,
>soundcard or ???).  BTW, DSP Blaster REQUIRES an ISA Soundblaster 16
>card only...no others supported, but the recommended version is the SB
>16 "Wave" or "Vibra 16" series.  Some SB 16 cards only have 8 bits D/A
>but these two models have 16 bits D/A which eliminates the slight
>output hiss you get if you only use 8 bit D/A.  These cards can be
>found used for <$10 shipped.
>
>Yes, I believe one can still buy DSP Blaster in the USA.  About a year
>ago I told a friend about it and he was able to buy a copy.  I have
>had nothing but excellent support from Brian on any of the programs I
>have from him.
>
>73,  Bill 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>





SPONSORED LINKS
Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to