Hi Gian, thanks for the info, could you send me a copy please?
73 Yuri, K3BU ----- Original Message ----- From: Giancarlo Date: Saturday, January 27, 2007 4:56 pm Subject: [soft_radio] Re: Softrock as receiver back end To: [email protected] > --- In [email protected], "rhblumeng" wrote: > > > > Hi Alberto and Group - > > > > There are some people using the softrock 6 Lite to take the > 455 IF > > from a receiver and then do the rest of the processing through > the > > combination of softrock/sound card/software. A groug using > this > > approach with a Yaesu FT1000D initially planning to use it > just as > a > > spectrum display concluded: > > > > "I can say conclusively that a weak SSB and CW signals are > generally > > more readable/more comfortably readable listening through the > digital > > filters of the SoftRock/Rocky or KGKSDR/Delta 44 than through > the > > crystal filtering of the FT1000 when there is QRN/static > crashes > > present. As the FT1000 receiver is widely regarded as one of > the > > best lowband weak signal receivers, owing to its excellent > cross > mod > > performance and filtering, this says a lot for how far digital > > filtering and processing has come." > > > > I wonder if anyone has an opinion as to how much of the better > > performance is due to the digital filtering and how much might > > actually be the different detection offered by IQ and the software? > > > > Bob > > > > Hi all, > > RSGB Memebers have received RadCom January 2007 issue. At pages > 53-54 > there is an article "Add-on bandscope" by VK6VZ & VK6APH. They > report > on a modification to aYaesu FT1000D to allow connection of a > SoftRock > V6 to perform bandscope. > I believe this extract can be posted in the Files directory > mentioning the origin and publication. As both the authors are > visiting, sometimes, this group they may confirm we can publish > it or > not. I have a pdf copy made. > > 73 > > Gian > I7SWX > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
