On Donnerstag 07 September 2006 23:55, Marko Mäkelä wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:41:11PM +0100, Alasdair Campbell wrote: > > On 07/09/06, Marko Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > By the way, what is the 14:9 crop mode good for? For viewing 3:2 > > > photographs? We only seem to get 4:3 and 16:9 programs. > > > > As an aside to this aside, I wanted to point out that the interlacing > > artifacts still show up when I set aspect to 5:4, I read somewhere > > that a tv's aspect ratio is 5:4 rather than a montiors 4:3. > > True, the pixels are not square. The aspect "default" seems identical to 5:4. > > > Is that right and is getting the great results with the DFB patch for > > 4:3 likely to be achieveable with 5:4? > > It seems so, with Stefan's DFB patch and my fresh video.c patch. > Stefan's right: also lxoff needs to be truncated: otherwise the > changing headline "BUSINESS", "SPORT" in your BBC News clip will > look bad on 5:4. Especially the "O" character of "SPORT" displays > some Moiré-like pattern when lxoff is not truncated like this: > > diff -p -u -r1.62 video.c > --- video.c 4 Sep 2006 20:29:54 -0000 1.62 > +++ video.c 7 Sep 2006 21:54:11 -0000 > @@ -265,8 +265,8 @@ void cVideoOut::AdjustToDisplayGeometry( > /* > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * center result on display > */ > - lxoff = (dwidth - lwidth) / 2; > - lyoff = (dheight - lheight) / 2; > + lxoff = ((dwidth - lwidth) / 2) & ~1; > + lyoff = ((dheight - lheight) / 2) & ~1; > } >
In cvs now. -- Stefan Lucke _______________________________________________ Softdevice-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/softdevice-devel
