Hi
You can borrow a network license, but you have to connect to your home
machine and check out the license first.
For a laptop that's not too bad, but for a workstation in the office
it's probably going to be a problem.
A standalone license can be transferred via the License Transfer Utility
(basically, you upload the license to an Autodesk server, and then
download it onto some other machine).
On 08/01/2013 3:46 PM, John Richard Sanchez wrote:
I have never done it but arent you allowed to "borrow" a license from
home?
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Sebastien Sterling
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
What a day it has been,
the issue has not been resolved but a tenuous agreement seems to
have been struck, for better or worse it will have to do if i am
to remain productive.
I would like to thank everyone who came on, for their help and
support in any form it may have been offered.
especially, Tim Leydecker, i feel we started out on the wrong
foot, but in a time of stress when i feel i lashed out, you where
quick to show empathy and understanding.
Stephen Blair for his resourcefulness in providing Key information.
Dave and Javier, a nice idea, but they would never allow it, it
would conflict with the clause of my contract stipulating never
taking any IP of the premisses and with every other network
conduct and antivirus stance.
i will get back too you now but my head is lolling and it has been
the most prustrating day, so please forgive and catch you toomorrow
On 8 January 2013 19:03, Tim Leydecker <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I generalized to make it read easier but won愒 insist
on this simplification used for the sake of illustrating
a big, heavy thing that may be intimidating at times,
exceed the scope of ones own field of view or just
as well be magic thing that mostly goes unnoticed.
My primary concern was to point out that there may be
conflicts that will more likely show when running into
the limits of an existing solution and that it may be
surprisingly hard to make people see the benefit of changing
things as first and foremost this means having to put in some
thought, some work and seeing the own area of comfortable control
or personal freedom in danger.
This applies to all positions involved, everybody has to refind
their new place and not everybody likes this.
I also would like to point out that any problem one may run into
in a scenario as such may easily found a criticism and that is
something where it is tempting to boldly react as if that愀
uncalled for.
It takes a strong personality to not take this personal but
see the
benefit of questioning the current status for the better and
be willing
to take this to each and everyone involved who may just be
fine with how
things work and not willing to adapt at all.
Which brought me to the Production Team, including the Supervisor.
For them, it愀 first of all a problem when all they want you to do
is function in a way that makes them deliver what they have
promised
to a client.
Only a few want to realise this ultimately mean
responsibility, not just sexy power.
Cheers,
tim
On 08.01.2013 18:14, Eric Turman wrote:
Tim: I wouldn't say that *all* pipelines are rigid and
unadaptable. If a pipeline is thoughtfully built from the
ground up to be flexible and scale in scope of its
"involvement"
from project to project, then it it does not have to be
gaff-taped, it simply rolls with the needs of a particular
style of project.
Sebastien: As far as IT and licensing, the more legwork
that you can do for you IT guy (proof of license, type of
license, download link, etc.) the more that he'll see that
you are
trying to help him and the more likely that he'll help you
back.
Just a thought,
-=Eric
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, David Gallagher
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
Wow, it's so close to the tweak tool, they should give
Softimage a nod.
This looks great. However, without the rigging
integration, it's not very alluring to me.
Dave
On 1/8/2013 10:45 AM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote:
If you're miserable modeling in Maya, I'd suggest
using the NEX
plug-in for Maya.
It's very softimage-like, with a tweak tool and a
command panel like XSI
https://draster.com/nex-1.5/__overview.html
<https://draster.com/nex-1.5/overview.html>
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:12 AM, David Gallagher
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
"if you have used softimage in production you
would doubtless realise that
one does not ease back so readily into maya. "
Ha! It will be a cold day in hell before I go
back to modeling/rigging in
Maya.
--
-=T=-
--
www.johnrichardsanchez.com <http://www.johnrichardsanchez.com>
