I have never done it but arent you allowed to "borrow" a license from home?
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Sebastien Sterling < [email protected]> wrote: > > > What a day it has been, > > the issue has not been resolved but a tenuous agreement seems to have been > struck, for better or worse it will have to do if i am to remain productive. > > > I would like to thank everyone who came on, for their help and support in > any form it may have been offered. > > especially, Tim Leydecker, i feel we started out on the wrong foot, but in > a time of stress when i feel i lashed out, you where quick to show empathy > and understanding. > > Stephen Blair for his resourcefulness in providing Key information. > > Dave and Javier, a nice idea, but they would never allow it, it would > conflict with the clause of my contract stipulating never taking any IP of > the premisses and with every other network conduct and antivirus stance. > > > i will get back too you now but my head is lolling and it has been the > most prustrating day, so please forgive and catch you toomorrow > > > > > > > > > On 8 January 2013 19:03, Tim Leydecker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I generalized to make it read easier but won愒 insist >> on this simplification used for the sake of illustrating >> a big, heavy thing that may be intimidating at times, >> exceed the scope of ones own field of view or just >> as well be magic thing that mostly goes unnoticed. >> >> My primary concern was to point out that there may be >> conflicts that will more likely show when running into >> the limits of an existing solution and that it may be >> surprisingly hard to make people see the benefit of changing >> things as first and foremost this means having to put in some >> thought, some work and seeing the own area of comfortable control >> or personal freedom in danger. >> >> This applies to all positions involved, everybody has to refind >> their new place and not everybody likes this. >> >> I also would like to point out that any problem one may run into >> in a scenario as such may easily found a criticism and that is >> something where it is tempting to boldly react as if that愀 uncalled for. >> >> It takes a strong personality to not take this personal but see the >> benefit of questioning the current status for the better and be willing >> to take this to each and everyone involved who may just be fine with how >> things work and not willing to adapt at all. >> >> Which brought me to the Production Team, including the Supervisor. >> >> For them, it愀 first of all a problem when all they want you to do >> is function in a way that makes them deliver what they have promised >> to a client. >> >> Only a few want to realise this ultimately mean responsibility, not just >> sexy power. >> >> Cheers, >> >> tim >> >> >> >> >> On 08.01.2013 18:14, Eric Turman wrote: >> >>> Tim: I wouldn't say that *all* pipelines are rigid and unadaptable. If a >>> pipeline is thoughtfully built from the ground up to be flexible and scale >>> in scope of its "involvement" >>> from project to project, then it it does not have to be gaff-taped, it >>> simply rolls with the needs of a particular style of project. >>> >>> Sebastien: As far as IT and licensing, the more legwork that you can do >>> for you IT guy (proof of license, type of license, download link, etc.) the >>> more that he'll see that you are >>> trying to help him and the more likely that he'll help you back. >>> >>> Just a thought, >>> -=Eric >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, David Gallagher < >>> [email protected] >>> <mailto:davegsoftimagelist@**gmail.com<[email protected]>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Wow, it's so close to the tweak tool, they should give Softimage a >>> nod. >>> >>> This looks great. However, without the rigging integration, it's not >>> very alluring to me. >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> On 1/8/2013 10:45 AM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote: >>> >>> If you're miserable modeling in Maya, I'd suggest using the NEX >>> plug-in for Maya. >>> It's very softimage-like, with a tweak tool and a command panel >>> like XSI >>> >>> https://draster.com/nex-1.5/__**overview.html<https://draster.com/nex-1.5/__overview.html>< >>> https://draster.com/nex-1.5/**overview.html<https://draster.com/nex-1.5/overview.html> >>> > >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:12 AM, David Gallagher >>> <[email protected] <mailto:davegsoftimagelist@** >>> gmail.com <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> >>> "if you have used softimage in production you would >>> doubtless realise that >>> one does not ease back so readily into maya. " >>> >>> Ha! It will be a cold day in hell before I go back to >>> modeling/rigging in >>> Maya. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -=T=- >>> >> > -- www.johnrichardsanchez.com
