Hey Rob,

thanks for the heads up. The change list includes lots of issues I reported 
some months ago,
I'm glad to see version 4 is taking shape since 3 did have some unnecessary 
limitations
and oddities which are being addressed now as it seems. It's such a cool piece 
of software
with so much potential....

There seems to be a new version coming:

http://www.si-community.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3427


Rob

\/-------------\/----------------\/

On 26-2-2013 7:40, Leonard Koch wrote:
From my experience of working with Momentum/Implosia on a few jobs and
watching some of the videos by MirVadim I would say, that RayFire is
better and a lot more intuitive for complex shattering.
The actual simulation speed and directability of the shattered pieces
however is many times better in Momentum.
For actual production I would be a lot more confident to make a
simulation look the way it is supposed to with Momentum.

Shattering, dynamic UVs and mainly caching are all still a bite iffy
with exocortex's solution, but the directability is unbeaten.


On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Emilio Hernandez <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    How far is Implosia with Momentum to achieve something like this?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mn3ifA1gcD8#!

    I need to break a wall earthquake style with ceiling coming down,
    small fragments, etc., and wondering if I can beat this Ray Fire
    stuff with Implosia and Momentum.  Need to win this gig.

    Thx.

    --


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2641/6133 - Release Date: 02/25/13





--
-------------------------------------------
Stefan Kubicek                   Co-founder
-------------------------------------------
          keyvis digital imagery
         Wehrgasse 9 - GrĂ¼ner Hof
           1050 Vienna  Austria
        Phone:    +43/699/12614231
--- www.keyvis.at  [email protected] ---
--  This email and its attachments are
--confidential and for the recipient only--

Reply via email to