Paul Griswold
Personally for compositing I would always go with Fusion.
Especially now that they have Generation AM out and they just
released some great open source Python modules for pipeline building.
I know Nuke is the big boy these days and I think Nuke and Fusion
both have their strengths and weaknesses, but I just tend to feel
like Fusion is a little more artist friendly and therefore faster
for me to work with.
I heard lots of good things about Fusion... what are it's main strengths
(and weaknesses) you were reffering to in you opinion, or what do you
like most?
Also had an extra 'with' in my reply :)
<.. timeline based /[solutions]/ such as AE (with stacked effects) it's
easier to have longer /with /compositions with a number of effects shots
as single projects while keeping an overview and control of the whole. >
cheers
On 06/04/2013 7:31 PM, Jason S wrote:
Node based workflows has the advantage of easily having the outputs of
effect streams as sources very easily (visually),
giving more space for complexity while remaning managable &
understandable.
Whereas timeline based such as AE (with stacked effects)
it's easier to have longer with compositions with a number of effects
shots as single projects while keeping an overview and control of the
whole.
Smoke (and DS) harness the best of both worlds.
But as far a I know, both AE & Fusion are excellent.
