It was one worth raising. It's all too easy to fall into the trap of not seeing the forest for the trees sometimes. :)
> In this case I was more proposing it's worth looking at that. 90% of the > stuff that starts simply emitted can usually be halved more cheaply, and > interacted with in more complexity producing better results, by reduing the > emission rule hits and then a straight forward tweaking of any frequency > based on the ID (if you have any). > > More of a food for thought than anything, I guess. Maybe should have not been > formulated as a question.
