Rob,

I'm trying to avoid geometry.

The offset sounds like a good idea, but not yet sure how that would be done. I 
think it would have to always be offset in the direction of the camera correct? 
I'm seeing consistent artifacts at this point which looks to be spatial 
disagreement along the camera Z axis. An offset of some sort would probably be 
required.

--
Joey Ponthieux
LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES)
Mymic Technical Services
NASA Langley Research Center
__________________________________________________
Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not 
represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rob Chapman
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 4:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Stranded....

well Joey, if you are going to get funky you may as well use custom geometry 
instances. this way the geometry lofted along the strand (a separate grid 
positioned in space is exactly the shape / position / offset from each curve 
you want it to be.

for efficiency though Strands would be preferred and 2 strands on top of each 
other *could* be ok if it is just *Strand Width* you want to offset them by and 
then if artifacts could be offset by a tiny offset increment surly which would 
help the overlap?

On 5 August 2013 22:01, Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES] 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi yall,
>
>
>
>
>
> I can currently apply multiple overlapping strands on the same curve, 
> but I get render artifacts where they reside in the same space. Are 
> there any tricks to prevent that?
>
>
>
> Ultimately I would like one strand to be wider than the other and 
> different colors, but on the same curve in the same space.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Joey Ponthieux
>
> LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES)
>
> Mymic Technical Services
>
> NASA Langley Research Center
>
> __________________________________________________
>
> Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not
>
> represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.
>
>

Reply via email to