Learn Maya? No thanks.

Personally I would prefer a total severing of all ties with AD. They're not
a great company and in general I would prefer to support one that is
smaller, and more focused on what I do instead of being almost an
afterthought.

If only their stockholders knew that they have been intentionally
suppressing the marketing and sales of an excellent product like Soft.
Instead of letting consumers decide what's a more viable product for their
needs, they've buried it for years now and that's a fact. Is it any wonder
sales aren't great? They've been pissing on our heads and telling us it's
raining. I hope someone gets their ass fired for it. Wishful thinking for
sure...

Eric
On Mar 1, 2014 2:01 AM, "Angus Davidson" <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Probably AD are smiling that we are doing as expected. Either way
> however its has  been managed incredibly poorly. Its particularly telling
> that there has not been any word from AD to wait and see. The only activity
> on the subject from AD has been a Maya person (Brent ) very kindly offering
> to help folks migrate to Maya. Not particularly reassuring.
>
>  Yes this happens every year, however if you look at the Max community
> when folks started out bemoaning their lack of development and there was a
> build up of momentum, the AD management sent a very clear signal for them
> not to worry. Where as on the Softimage side we have had sweet blow all.
> For people paying the same money the imbalance is very large.
>
>  That is why people are very upset.
>
>
>  *From:* Graham D Clark [[email protected]]
> *Sent:* 01 March 2014 08:28 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: new upgrade policy
>
>   Self fulfilling prophecy.
>
> Graham D Clark, Head of Stereography, Deluxe 3D dba Stereo D
> phone: why-I-stereo
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/grahamclark
>
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>   Kris,
> Dead for certain? Not yet, it is still rumor and hope to stay that way
> only.
>
>
>       This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is 
> confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
> us immediately and destroy the original message. You may not copy or 
> disseminate this communication without the permission of the University. Only 
> authorised signatories are competent to enter into agreements on behalf of 
> the University and recipients are thus advised that the content of this 
> message may not be legally binding on the University and may contain the 
> personal views and opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the 
> views and opinions of The University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All 
> agreements between the University and outsiders are subject to South African 
> Law unless the University agrees in writing to the contrary.
>
>

Reply via email to