+1
2014-03-04 10:55 GMT-06:00 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>: > question is clear true but right now non of those really offers me > anything that I can use in daily work covering all are from modeling to rig > animation lighting and rendering. > anything form the list would mean either months of learning to be at even > close level to be able to make anything in reasonable time, or to hire more > people that are proficient in those software and then go through all story > again learning new pipeline and organisation....in my opinion neither > option is worth of time and will rather stick with SI as 99% of projects > for the past 17 years are in range that can be done easily even at current > level of software. I can see me changing pipeline only if something > completely new arrive at market that can match my needs, right now nothing > like that is on horizon. biggest hole that everything else have is > character aniamtion, only maya can match that part BUT then big minus in > Maya is rigging so that falls out of plan as well > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Francisco Criado <malcriad...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I think Allan wants to know with the poll the migration to software that >> will be available in the future, which is something everybody on the user >> list should be interested. I think that, as a softimage user is pretty >> important to see where all the majority of users or studios would migrate, >> softimage in that case is not a chance, at least if you think in the next >> 10 years. Nice to see houdini goes ahead. >> >> >> On Tuesday, March 4, 2014, Mathias N <mdawn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> No option for sticking with Softimage till the end? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Alan Fregtman >>> <alan.fregt...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> I've set up a poll out of curiosity... >>>> >>>> *Where will you transition to when Softimage falls?* Vote! >>>> >>>> http://strawpoll.me/1257710 >>>> >>>> (Multiple-choice allowed btw.) >>>> >>>> >>> >
