Hi Morten,
It’s http://area.autodesk.com/softimagetransition
Maurice

Maurice Patel
Autodesk : Tél:  514 954-7134

From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com 
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Morten Bartholdy
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 5:01 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Autodesk webinar


Maurice, could you please post a link to this - I am lost in thousands of mails 
in my inbox these days.



Morten



Den 18. marts 2014 kl. 00:52 skrev Maurice Patel 
<maurice.pa...@autodesk.com<mailto:maurice.pa...@autodesk.com>>:

> Hi Emilio et al.
> About the webinar: First sorry about the technical problems. Google servers 
> and our streaming servers had issues and we lost the service. Yes the 
> questions were screened. We were not sure of the volume of the questions we 
> would get and suspected it would be too high to try and handle onscreen on 
> the fly.  But behind the camera questions were being collected and fed to us 
> - such as Greg and others' question "why should I trust Autodesk?" - which 
> was the live component. We answered pretty much all the questions posed 
> although we tried to avoid repeating similar questions. We answered the key 
> recurring ones : why don't you sell/license/open source Softimage? Why don't 
> you continue development longer/forever? Why discontinue what we feel is your 
> best/most innovative product. The answer to those three questions are so we 
> can focus more of our efforts on Maya and 3ds Max. Now you may find our 
> answers unsatisfactory but that is why we are doing it.
> We have now posted the full recording should anyone want to refer to it 
> -ultimately there is not a whole much more new than what has been already 
> been discussed on this forum.
> maurice
>
>
> Maurice Patel
> Autodesk : Tél:  514 954-7134
>
> From: 
> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>
>  
> [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com]<mailto:[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com]>
>  On Behalf Of Emilio Hernandez
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 5:45 PM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
> Subject: Autodesk webinar
>
> Well I really do not understand this Autodesk "client oriented" policy. But 
> if I was there, at this time at least, I would have come in and asked at 
> least for an apology and will reschedule the webinar.
>
> What sense it makes to watch a recorded webinar without the live QA session? 
> They were already filtering the questions if it is true that they were 
> actually real questions more focused in the "if I have a horse can I trade it 
> for a pony?"
>
> We waited two weeks to hear what they have to offer us that will show how 
> wrong we were for not believe in them.
>
> This only confirms that we should not believe in them and that they really do 
> not care about us. Seems that the removal of the timebomb was more "a taking 
> a step ahead before someone will come with a lawsuit based on damages".
>
> This two weeks of "we are listening you" were nothing else but BS, while they 
> were trying to make us sing "everything is wonderful".
>
> Again the door of uncertainty and speculation is wide open.
>
> Nothing Autodesk has told us about why they decided to kill Softimage makes 
> full sense at all.
>
> The only thought in my mind is that Softimage was coming from behind even 
> without proper branding/marketing strategy, and their Maya cardhouse was 
> starting to fall apart.
>
> Cheaper than Maya, less human resources to operate, no big dev team behind to 
> create tools that should be out of the box or to fix things that get broken. 
> Better workflow...  Even without been truly improved since Autodesk acquired 
> it. ICE not only for particles or VFX but as well to find quick workarounds 
> for rigging and precedural modeling.
>
> Lots of money spent in Maya "innovation" but that it seems they only bought 
> plugins to Maya brand them.
>
> Call it the conspiracy theory if you want.  But it makes more sense than any 
> other "official" explanation.
>
> Imagine how they will look if Autodesk starts selling more Softimage seats 
> instead of Maya. Even that they have invested a lot in Maya and nearly 
> nothing in Softimage.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Emilio Hernández   VFX & 3D animation.
>

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to