If you have bought the beta you have a $100 credit on the release. ------------------------------------------------------- Emilio Hernández VFX & 3D animation.
2014-03-20 18:24 GMT-06:00 Matt Morris <matt...@gmail.com>: > Well, until it gets released end of march, then the price will be $500 for > the full version. Still a bargain in my eyes, and a fantastic renderer. > > > > On 21 March 2014 00:16, Francisco Criado <malcriad...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Guys, today i bought one license, half an hour later was already >> delivering a shot, must say i'm impressed! very powerful engine, and just >> for $100 ! >> >> F. >> >> >> >> On Thursday, February 27, 2014, Eric Lampi <ericla...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I just scratched the surface with RS early in the beta test last summer. >>> My wife was doing pro-bono design work for the NYC Human Rights Campaign >>> fundraising gala, and one afternoon I whipped up a neon sign graphic for >>> her. Rendering was a breeze and of course very very fast compared to Mental >>> Ray. >>> >>> Just go spend the $100 and play with it. It's well worth it! >>> >>> Eric >>> On Feb 27, 2014 9:34 AM, "olivier jeannel" <olivier.jean...@noos.fr> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Bumping that thread, to share enthousiasm. >>>> >>>> I've just switched from RS Alpha 0.2.1 to the Beta 0.3.46. Spent a huge >>>> 100$ bill.... >>>> Today is my testing day, doodeling, trying things that were not >>>> implemented. You know, just re-descovering. >>>> >>>> Well, the speed is there. I'm doing an interior (ok semi interior, >>>> walls are opened), in rather dark color and it's noise free. >>>> >>>> But what amaze me is the integration. I'm mixing several bumps, some >>>> are repeating some are not, with several different set of UVs, and it's >>>> doing exactly what it is supposed to do. >>>> >>>> ... And dof is activated on preview, because it's free. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 18/02/2014 16:17, Ed Manning a écrit : >>>> >>>> Yes, I AM ignoring the RAM requirements of Elysium-style scenes. So >>>> none of those in my scenario. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Ed Manning <etmth...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Steven Caron <car...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> doesn't work like that... i have to convince someone to buy it for >>>>>> the studio, then the graphics cards you guys talk about... 3 titans!? we >>>>>> don't have those types of investments. we have an existing farm with cpus >>>>>> and lots of ram. if i want to render a sequence with redshift... i have >>>>>> to >>>>>> render it on workstations only. also, i am not going to convert elysium >>>>>> to >>>>>> work for redshift on my free time ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> You might be able to write a script to convert the materials, >>>>> since the parameters are pretty close to Arnold's (they're VERY similar to >>>>> MR's so going from there would be relatively easy). >>>>> >>>>> One possible selling point to management -- since your workstations >>>>> are probably pretty well-equipped in GPU, and those GPUs are idle all >>>>> night, you'd be leveraging capacity that's already paid-for. You wouldn't >>>>> even need to take the workstations off the CPU farm, just earmark a couple >>>>> of cores on each for scene loading and conversion for Redshift. Network >>>>> and >>>>> server might get stressed a bit, but that's kind of normal... >>>>> >>>>> Also see my other post on the costs to transition to GPU from CPU. >>>>> Speaking as a small business owner, I gotta say the GPU path looks MORE >>>>> attractive financially. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > > > -- > www.matinai.com >
