OP=Original Poster, in this case Nicolas Esposito :)
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Nicolas Esposito <[email protected]> wrote: > If I remember correctly the only thing that AD added was the lipsync > tool...then nothing else....really a shame, but at least it was included > inside Softimage instead of paying 90k$ for this software. > > And by the way, those tech demo are two in probably thousand were people > actually put time and effort to develop it further, but as a solution out > of the box its not so friendly...and over the years many alternatives start > popping up, from Max, Maya and Soft itself right now there are choices, > while since FR was one of the first to try to put it "easy" > Again, such a shame, it'll be buried together with Softimage > > > 2014-05-27 14:22 GMT+02:00 Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]>: > > Absolutely true, but again keep in mind that ever since it was included in >> SI it haven't bin touched. Not really :) >> Ofc it is not first nor last piece of software that ended up as dead end. >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Nicolas Esposito <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Blur tech demo was quite impressive ( 2009 Dante's Inferno )...by it was >>> customized as well....Jawanimation tech demo ( 2011 ) is pretty damn good, >>> but then again customized using ICE...I saw lots and lots of people just >>> build their own facial rig rather then using FR because of the jerky >>> workflow >>> >>> >>> 2014-05-27 14:14 GMT+02:00 Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]>: >>> >>> OP? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Marco Peixoto <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I got be honest here.. I never saw anything "Jaw Droping" from FR... >>>>> im not saying that amazing work wasnt done with it because it was, but >>>>> nothing that would make it stand on its own, always found the Falcon >>>>> examples to look more like a Rubber face than real tissue and muscles >>>>> moving. >>>>> >>>>> The demo present by the OP is far more impressive than anything I had >>>>> seen with FR. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Mirko Jankovic < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Face robot is as already mentioned couple years old. NEVER touched by >>>>>> anyone later to improve, or even build something similar on top of it >>>>>> with >>>>>> newtech and better integration. >>>>>> But even that slow at the time it was good solution and gave amount >>>>>> of detail that no one else had before. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Nicolas Esposito >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Email sent, waiting for an answer, I'll keep you guys updated >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regarding Facerobot yes, its slow and there are some stupid issues >>>>>>> which cause so many problems that lots of people just can't stand it >>>>>>> anymore after a while...too bad that AD never improved the technology. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, in Soft Gear is a pretty damn good alternative, too bad >>>>>>> there's no lipsync option for that, which comes handy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014-05-27 13:19 GMT+02:00 pedro santos <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That said. We don't know the requirements of this one? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
