Absolutely true, but again keep in mind that ever since it was included in SI it haven't bin touched. Not really :) Ofc it is not first nor last piece of software that ended up as dead end.
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Nicolas Esposito <[email protected]> wrote: > Blur tech demo was quite impressive ( 2009 Dante's Inferno )...by it was > customized as well....Jawanimation tech demo ( 2011 ) is pretty damn good, > but then again customized using ICE...I saw lots and lots of people just > build their own facial rig rather then using FR because of the jerky > workflow > > > 2014-05-27 14:14 GMT+02:00 Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]>: > > OP? >> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Marco Peixoto <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I got be honest here.. I never saw anything "Jaw Droping" from FR... im >>> not saying that amazing work wasnt done with it because it was, but nothing >>> that would make it stand on its own, always found the Falcon examples to >>> look more like a Rubber face than real tissue and muscles moving. >>> >>> The demo present by the OP is far more impressive than anything I had >>> seen with FR. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Mirko Jankovic < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Face robot is as already mentioned couple years old. NEVER touched by >>>> anyone later to improve, or even build something similar on top of it with >>>> newtech and better integration. >>>> But even that slow at the time it was good solution and gave amount of >>>> detail that no one else had before. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Nicolas Esposito <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Email sent, waiting for an answer, I'll keep you guys updated >>>>> >>>>> Regarding Facerobot yes, its slow and there are some stupid issues >>>>> which cause so many problems that lots of people just can't stand it >>>>> anymore after a while...too bad that AD never improved the technology. >>>>> >>>>> Well, in Soft Gear is a pretty damn good alternative, too bad there's >>>>> no lipsync option for that, which comes handy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2014-05-27 13:19 GMT+02:00 pedro santos <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> That said. We don't know the requirements of this one? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
