*"- *we are open to creating a consortium and finding ways to open-source work done there. Obviously there are hooks into Fabric and the concern will be around vendor dependency – however, a lot of that can be addressed in the design of a particular project. We have done deals that give source code access to customers after a certain number of years, and we will work with studios to give that kind of security. "
http://fabricengine.com/2014/03/fabric-engine-softimage-and-the-vfx-industry/ looks like they have done source code access guy, On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Guy Rabiller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Then why do I have to provoke you in order to get an answer after having > said you are not going to go into this topic any further ? A classic. > > It's painful to have a discussion with someone who presses his finger > where it hurts, I admit that. > > But frankly I don't care much about how my comments are perceived, or what > peoples think about me for that matter, as I'm dead serious about what I > wrote and I know I am dead right. > > Ask around, re-read this mailing-list archives, I was dead right about the > Softimage future when Autodesk bought it - and even before - while most > peoples were smiling and naively swallowing Autodesk, Marc Petit and Marc > Stevens statements and reinsurance. > > Today, I know I'm dead right about the future of Fabric Engine if its > business model stays that way, despite it is my business or not, despite > you like my comments or not, despite you like me or not, despite it is > painful to hear it or not. > > I hope to be proven wrong this time though. > > RDV here in a few years. Good Luck. > > Cheers, > Guy. > -- > > guy rabiller | radfac founder | raa.tel > >
