Better Adobe than Autode$k. Is the less bad co. between both. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Mario Reitbauer <[email protected]> wrote:
> You are right. > > 2015-04-27 22:32 GMT+02:00 Cristobal Infante <[email protected]>: > >> Well we've known for a while The foundry is up for sale. This article is >> clearly a strategic PR move possibly from the foundry to speed things up. >> >> It's basically a massive ad that says "The foundry is for sale, and there >> is an offer on the table. Anyone else interested? Autodesk maybe?" >> >> >> >> >> >> On 27 April 2015 at 17:17, Mario Reitbauer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Well except of Autodesk there couldnt be anything worse then the Carlyle >>> group. >>> >>> So I wouldn't think that this would be too bad. >>> >>> 2015-04-27 15:52 GMT+02:00 Angus Davidson <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> On the plus side. If our University finally gets an adobe site >>>> licence it would mean no separate licences for Modo. >>>> >>>> Yes thats me looking really hard for a silver lining ;) >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* Simon Reeves [[email protected]] >>>> *Sent:* 27 April 2015 03:36 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: "The shadow over The Foundry" >>>> >>>> great quote >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Simon Reeves >>>> London, UK >>>> *[email protected]* >>>> *www.simonreeves.com <http://www.simonreeves.com>* >>>> *www.analogstudio.co.uk <http://www.analogstudio.co.uk>* >>>> >>>> On 27 April 2015 at 14:06, Toonafish <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Can't take it too seriously when I read this snippet about Modo: >>>>> >>>>> "The company* has recently launched a concept design software product >>>>> <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/businessclub/technology/11206167/Harry-Potter-to-Guardians-of-the-Galaxy-the-British-firm-behind-the-Hollywood-blockbusters.html> >>>>> *called Modo, which means that prototype cars, phones and trainers >>>>> can be drawn immediately into 3D rather than drawn first by hand in 2D and >>>>> then physically built." >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Jordi Bares Dominguez < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This could be quite a blessing. >>>>>> >>>>>> jb >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 27 Apr 2015, at 11:11, Nicolas Esposito <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like Adobe is trying to get a piece of the VFX industries >>>>>> >>>>>> Link of the article >>>>>> <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/privateequity/11562472/Adobe-eyes-200m-bid-for-British-visual-effects-firm-The-Foundry.html> >>>>>> >>>>>> Good? Bad? Adobe to be the next Autodesk-Evil-Corp-Inc? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Ronald van Vemden >>>>> ----------------------------------------------- >>>>> 3D Graphics & Animation >>>>> Cyberfish Laboratories | www.cyberfish.nl >>>>> Toonafish | www.toonafish.nl >>>>> tel. +31(0)20 5289291 >>>>> fax +31(0)20 5289292 >>>>> email: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is >>>> confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please >>>> notify us immediately and destroy the original message. You may not copy >>>> or disseminate this communication without the permission of the >>>> University. Only authorised signatories are competent to enter into >>>> agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus advised >>>> that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the >>>> University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, >>>> which are not necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the >>>> Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and >>>> outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in >>>> writing to the contrary. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
