Or maybe people that want it and want it to work in what isn't a dead software yet should write to AD and point out they find it inappropriate that it was removed for what is solely the sake to keep the version numbers in line ;)
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]> wrote: > well just stay on mudbox 2015 then as well. not like they made anything > interesting in 2016 anyway.... > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Tenshi S. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Mudbox to Softimage, It's something i'll miss a lot then, it works really >> good. Maya to Softimage and viceversa, too. Damn... how the heck they >> remove this thing? It's really important feature, it saves a lot of time. >> If they don't want to give us a 2016 version, at least they'll try to put >> those lines of codes to make it work in the 2015SP2(i hope that's coming?) >> version. >> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Tim Leydecker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It would be a very welcome functionality, especially when being dealt >>> an old Softimage 2015 along with everything else labeled 2016 as part of >>> a new suite package. >>> >>> In the past, I found it difficult to run differently labeled versions, >>> e.g. Softimage 2012 >>> with Maya 2014 or Mudbox 2014 simultaneously, due to lmtools telling me >>> there´s >>> no license available, that could well be a setup error on my end or a >>> misunderstanding >>> of the suite licensing scheme but if that´s the root of the problem, >>> that Softimage2015 >>> +Mudbox2016 will not easily serve themselves in sharing a >>> (suite)license, then it >>> would be a good time to adress that, too? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> tim >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 30.04.2015 um 06:20 schrieb Raffaele Fragapane: >>> >>> Yeah, I reckon they should add it back in. AD has back pedalled on some >>> minor things like this before, so it might still happen, and it would be a >>> welcome grace to a userbase that has, frankly speaking, already been >>> slighted pretty hard. >>> >>> It certainly won't happen though if part of that user base takes the >>> pessimist approach and claims it never worked, when it did, or because they >>> don't need it assumes other don't either. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Greg Punchatz <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It and goZ are huge time savers! Huge! >>>> >>>> It does seem to me this would fall into the " AD should do it I the >>>> SPs until the Soft support being promised until 2016" >>>> >>>> It is just a few lines of code Luc, can you do us old softies a favor >>>> and send the request the send up the ranks to send to apps back in? Did >>>> Maya and Max lose their send to soft connections too? >>>> >>>> I think we are in our right to ask for this small gesture from AD >>>> >>>> Thanks for listening Luc... I know there is nothing you can promise, >>>> but give it a shot for those of us you used to your clients. >>>> >>>> g >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Our users will know fear and cower before our software! Ship it! Ship it and let them flee like the dogs they are!
