Your right. Few updates in 2016. Less than 4 features and a few bug fixes. For a new version one will expect something more. At least 10 features and 20 bug fixes. =/
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Tim Leydecker <[email protected]> wrote: > Relax. I don´t want to miss the new Relax brush in Mudbox 2016. > > That´s the only green bracketed (highlight what´s new option = 1) I found > sofar. > > I´m sure there´s more inovations but it´s in another package? > > > Am 30.04.2015 um 21:50 schrieb Mirko Jankovic: > > well just stay on mudbox 2015 then as well. not like they made anything > interesting in 2016 anyway.... > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Tenshi S. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Mudbox to Softimage, It's something i'll miss a lot then, it works really >> good. Maya to Softimage and viceversa, too. Damn... how the heck they >> remove this thing? It's really important feature, it saves a lot of time. >> If they don't want to give us a 2016 version, at least they'll try to put >> those lines of codes to make it work in the 2015SP2(i hope that's coming?) >> version. >> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Tim Leydecker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It would be a very welcome functionality, especially when being dealt >>> an old Softimage 2015 along with everything else labeled 2016 as part of >>> a new suite package. >>> >>> In the past, I found it difficult to run differently labeled versions, >>> e.g. Softimage 2012 >>> with Maya 2014 or Mudbox 2014 simultaneously, due to lmtools telling me >>> there´s >>> no license available, that could well be a setup error on my end or a >>> misunderstanding >>> of the suite licensing scheme but if that´s the root of the problem, >>> that Softimage2015 >>> +Mudbox2016 will not easily serve themselves in sharing a >>> (suite)license, then it >>> would be a good time to adress that, too? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> tim >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 30.04.2015 um 06:20 schrieb Raffaele Fragapane: >>> >>> Yeah, I reckon they should add it back in. AD has back pedalled on some >>> minor things like this before, so it might still happen, and it would be a >>> welcome grace to a userbase that has, frankly speaking, already been >>> slighted pretty hard. >>> >>> It certainly won't happen though if part of that user base takes the >>> pessimist approach and claims it never worked, when it did, or because they >>> don't need it assumes other don't either. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Greg Punchatz <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It and goZ are huge time savers! Huge! >>>> >>>> It does seem to me this would fall into the " AD should do it I the >>>> SPs until the Soft support being promised until 2016" >>>> >>>> It is just a few lines of code Luc, can you do us old softies a favor >>>> and send the request the send up the ranks to send to apps back in? Did >>>> Maya and Max lose their send to soft connections too? >>>> >>>> I think we are in our right to ask for this small gesture from AD >>>> >>>> Thanks for listening Luc... I know there is nothing you can promise, >>>> but give it a shot for those of us you used to your clients. >>>> >>>> g >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
