a 1:1 copy of some of the best ZBrush brushes (dam standard springs to
mind)
would have been nice, something ZBrush Dynamesh as a surprise extension,
too.
How about some new presets, some vector tooltips/brush images, just a
little well deserved love.
Mudbox is so nice in how easy it can be picked up and used (compared to
ZBrush´s GUI and methodology)
it´s sad that it´s been left out like that.
Still, I took the treetrunk example, retopoed, subdivided it to some 50
million polygons by mistake and Mudbox
kept itself responsive...
Am 01.05.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Tenshi S.:
Your right. Few updates in 2016. Less than 4 features and a few bug
fixes. For a new version one will expect something more. At least 10
features and 20 bug fixes. =/
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Tim Leydecker <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Relax. I don´t want to miss the new Relax brush in Mudbox 2016.
That´s the only green bracketed (highlight what´s new option = 1)
I found sofar.
I´m sure there´s more inovations but it´s in another package?
Am 30.04.2015 um 21:50 schrieb Mirko Jankovic:
well just stay on mudbox 2015 then as well. not like they made
anything interesting in 2016 anyway....
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Tenshi S. <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Mudbox to Softimage, It's something i'll miss a lot then, it
works really good. Maya to Softimage and viceversa, too.
Damn... how the heck they remove this thing? It's really
important feature, it saves a lot of time. If they don't want
to give us a 2016 version, at least they'll try to put those
lines of codes to make it work in the 2015SP2(i hope that's
coming?) version.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Tim Leydecker
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It would be a very welcome functionality, especially when
being dealt
an old Softimage 2015 along with everything else labeled
2016 as part of
a new suite package.
In the past, I found it difficult to run differently
labeled versions, e.g. Softimage 2012
with Maya 2014 or Mudbox 2014 simultaneously, due to
lmtools telling me there´s
no license available, that could well be a setup error on
my end or a misunderstanding
of the suite licensing scheme but if that´s the root of
the problem, that Softimage2015
+Mudbox2016 will not easily serve themselves in sharing a
(suite)license, then it
would be a good time to adress that, too?
Cheers,
tim
Am 30.04.2015 um 06:20 schrieb Raffaele Fragapane:
Yeah, I reckon they should add it back in. AD has back
pedalled on some minor things like this before, so it
might still happen, and it would be a welcome grace to a
userbase that has, frankly speaking, already been
slighted pretty hard.
It certainly won't happen though if part of that user
base takes the pessimist approach and claims it never
worked, when it did, or because they don't need it
assumes other don't either.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Greg Punchatz
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It and goZ are huge time savers! Huge!
It does seem to me this would fall into the " AD
should do it I the SPs until the Soft support being
promised until 2016"
It is just a few lines of code Luc, can you do us
old softies a favor and send the request the send
up the ranks to send to apps back in? Did Maya and
Max lose their send to soft connections too?
I think we are in our right to ask for this small
gesture from AD
Thanks for listening Luc... I know there is nothing
you can promise, but give it a shot for those of us
you used to your clients.
g
Sent from my iPhone
