“If we reduce AD's behaviors to 'corporate greed' like this forum tends to do, then alienating thousands of users is illogical.”
Didn’t they do that already? ;) This is the Softimage list, isn’t it? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Artur W Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 3:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Autodesk acquires Solid Angle Many AD corporate decisions seem irrational and strange to us. Why should this case be any different? I truly wish everything would go as we wanted. Constant progress and development of Arnold. 2016-04-19 0:20 GMT+02:00 Steven Caron <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: Yes, some aren't excited about paying AD money but that is what I am saying... AD will need to keep these people happy or they will ditch Arnold. Breaking Arnold in C4D or Houdini is a lose lose scenario. They don't sell a Maya license and they don't sell an Arnold license. If we reduce AD's behaviors to 'corporate greed' like this forum tends to do, then alienating thousands of users is illogical. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Artur W <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Yes, but as we know a lot of people pay them not very willingly. Matter of choice. So, conspiracy theory, all they need to do after they plant arnold within Maya and/or Max is to just mess SDK a bit. Not as if they haven't already on purpose or by accident. Vray suddenly having glitches and bugs, the promises of fixes prolong. Just imagining things, but who knows. ------ Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
------ Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
