As to the speed of final frame quality, I'd say it's faster than Arnold but not as fast as V-Ray. The time saving is in the production of the shots. It's an exceptionally fluid and creative way to work.
On 17 February 2017 at 21:24, Eugene Flormata <[email protected]> wrote: > are other studios just using clarisse as look dev? or are they using it > for final render? > because redshift is just so fast for final no flicker renders, would my > guess that clarisse is comparable to arnold in render time be appropriate > if it was for final render? > > >> 2017-02-17 21:23 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Moore <[email protected]>: >> >>> I'm using clarisse's new renderer and it's been a dream. It's quickly >>>> becoming my favorite over redshift for shear polygon muscle. >>>> I had 180 billion polygons (no proxy) in a scene on my laptop the other >>>> day. Still running 90 fps like a champ. >>> >>> > ------ > Softimage Mailing List. > To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] > with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm. >
------ Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
