--- In [email protected], Jack Brindle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Interesting. I would push very hard to not re-invent the wheel with  
> this. Existing CAT standards (there are too many already) have  
> frequency setting already built in. My first question would be to ask  
> why these commands could not be used. If using the Elecraft/Kenwood  
> format, the FA (or FB) command should be able to do the task quite  
> well to set the center frequency. Actually, this should be rather  
> easy to implement; the biggest problem would be the RS-232 interface  
> chip and its associated voltage inverters which would create noise  
> for the radio. There are ways around this that eliminate the problem  
> (think Dallas DS275).
> 

I think you're exactly right, Jack.  There is no reason why we shouldn't co-opt 
some other 
command set and implement it such that a SR might talk just the same as 
something else, 
much less of an uphill battle having the radios supported.

Anybody have a feel for one or other that is more well documented?  I'm mostly 
familiar 
with the Elecraft/Kenwood command set.

As came up at FDIM about the DSP residing someplace else (HPSDR--future) than a 
PC.  
Thats a large jump, but, I think it's worth watching what others are doing.

I think initially it may just be providing a way to control the radios in a 
familiar manner 
with familiar software.

VKN

> 
> On May 20, 2008, at 11:13 AM, kc0vkn wrote:
> 
> > Pete and I were trading emails earlier and I think it's more along  
> > the lines of an SDR CAT.
> >
> >   One way to look at it may be an attempt now to write a command  
> > set so that folks doing
> > whatever interfacing (PIC, PicAxe, Amtel, MSP430 etc..etc) would be  
> > able to use a canned set
> > of functions to provide some sort (serial, whatever) control over  
> > things like band switching.
> > Assuming other folks have already broken ground by providing such  
> > code.
> >
> > We might be able to come up with a standard (or use an existing  
> > one), that'd let folks be
> > creative in how they manage their SR's but also mean that any  
> > software development for the
> > front-end would have a standard interface to the hardware.
> >
> > Is this along the lines you were thinking Pete?
> >
> > Joe, KC0VKN
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> 
> - Jack Brindle, W6FB
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
----- 
> ---------------------
>



Reply via email to