On Nov 10, 2010, at 1:14 AM, Ralph Droms wrote: > And is there a description of the "local name resolution library" (quoting > Dave) that meets the requirements of the softwires usage expectation? That > is, does the softwires WG expect "the usual" behavior by just handing the > contents of the option to the local name resolution library, or by > formulating several different FQDNs according to some specific rules, or ???
There is no special requirement here beside just resolve the FQDN... This is, I'm sure, not the first DHCP option like this, why should we say anything special here? - Alain. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
