> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Ted Lemon > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 4:13 PM > To: Alain Durand > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Softwires] draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option-06 > > On Nov 10, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Alain Durand wrote: > > I have not heard any requirement to have anything else in that option. > > The document itself specifies the use of the search list, so that's the > reason for > the discussion. If there's no requirement for unqualified or > partially-qualified > domain names, I think it would be better to take it out of the draft. It > adds a lot > of complexity, a lot of room for error, and no obvious value, since if the > DHCP > server is providing the search list, presumably it could be configured to > simply > provide a fully-qualified domain name.
Personally I'd prefer saying less, rather than more. That is, it's a string that is to be passed to the name resolver library. I wouldn't mention the search path, since that's not done by the DHCP client, it's done (or not) by the name resolver library. -Dave _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
