On 7/30/11 3:38 PM, Satoru Matsushima wrote:
On 2011/07/30, at 8:26, Peng Wu wrote:
a) Stateful+Dynamic port sets: e.g. DS-Lite
b) Stateful+Static port set: e.g. draft-cui-softwire-host-4over6-06
c) Stateless + Static port set: e.g. 4rd, 4via6 translation
d) Stateless + Dynamic port set: ??(Any candidate solution?)
I would say that the last one makes no sense
Agree. It is a problem space only on that logical frame.
I think that the analysis work doesn't need to insist necessity of unfeasible
area solution.
Well, A+P got enormous amounts of criticism because there was no dynamic
allocations of additional ports.
Now we don't need that anymore, just because stateless solution can't
handle it by design?
I love stateless a+p flavors, but imho we'll need both solutions,
stateless and statefull and both of them with dynamic port ranges or
sets, whatever you might call them.
Cheers, Jan Zorz
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
