On 8/1/11 1:07 PM, Satoru Matsushima wrote:
So my question is that how dynamic is dynamic, and how static is
static. The analogy of dynamic routing is that dynamic for updating
routing information for prefixes but forwarding plane is stateless.
If you imagine dynamic port ranges within stateless, it sounds like
port range aware routing. I think that it would be controversial.
yes, kind of.
Well, is short words, whatever number of ports you assign in
port-set/range, end user can exhaust them.
You need then give the user additional ports in order to communicate or
decide otherwise and send all additional traffic from this point on to
big evil CGN in the core.
Any idea how to solve this with 4rd and don't use CGN?
Cheers, Jan Zorz
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
