On 8/1/11 5:04 PM, Qiong wrote:
So, this is a problem about how to define appropriate port set for our
customers, or to define maximum concurrent subscribers for a given IPv4
address pool. Otherwise, there would either be a waste of resource, or
port exhaustion. Maybe we can even make some more flexible port-set
rules for different time-slot or different types of users. But anyway,
this is the problem we have to face in the further, and I also suggest
that port-consuming applications should upgrade to IPv6 directly.
hi
assigning initial port range to every user and then dynamically
additional port ranges (or sets) solves this problem. This was solved
for statefull a+p. stateless still lacks this feature, requested by this
wg years ago.
cheers, /jan
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
