On 2011/08/01, at 18:26, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > Well, A+P got enormous amounts of criticism because there was no dynamic > allocations of additional ports. > > Now we don't need that anymore, just because stateless solution can't handle > it by design? > > I love stateless a+p flavors, but imho we'll need both solutions, stateless > and statefull and both of them with dynamic port ranges or sets, whatever you > might call them.
So my question is that how dynamic is dynamic, and how static is static. The analogy of dynamic routing is that dynamic for updating routing information for prefixes but forwarding plane is stateless. If you imagine dynamic port ranges within stateless, it sounds like port range aware routing. I think that it would be controversial. cheers, --satoru _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
