Hi Yiu, One clarification.
On 2011/08/02, at 2:29, Lee, Yiu wrote: > Actually, Orange Lab did some tests on A+P. They published the results in > v6ops: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-v6ops-aplusp-experiment-results-01 > > In their tests, bittorrent seems use most ports (200). Other public apps > use no more than 100 ports. For a family of 5, I think 2000 ports should > be significant at any given time. > Which do you mean '2000' is the number of port you need, or the number of NAT table sessions? cheers, --satoru > > > On 8/1/11 11:05 AM, "Rémi Després" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the quotation. >> What was "thrown" to you doesn't seem right, and needs to be challenged. >> >> Answer to the question: >> - The customer doesn't run out of ports because it has an exclusive >> private IPv4 address. >> - If the CPE NAT44 runs out of ports, is just does what it does today in >> the same situation. >> In addition, the probability of the CPE running out of IPv4 ports in a >> dual-stack-service site having 4K ports needs not be higher than in an >> IPv4-only site having 64K ports. > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
