Hi, Satoru, Yes, the 'draft-cui-softwire-host-4over6' doesn't mention IPv4 address sharing. But 'lightweight 4over6' has mentioned IPv4 address sharing. http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite-01.txt
Thanks Best wishes Qiong Sun On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Satoru Matsushima < [email protected]> wrote: > One clarification. > > On 2011/07/29, at 10:18, GangChen wrote: > > > Before making such comparison (of course it should be as fair as > possible), > > I think we need to state what solution space we are targeting and what > > category mode we should take care. > > If I understand correctly, I would paraphrase as following categories. > > > > a) Stateful+Dynamic port sets: e.g. DS-Lite > > b) Stateful+Static port set: e.g. draft-cui-softwire-host-4over6-06 > > c) Stateless + Static port set: e.g. 4rd, 4via6 translation > > d) Stateless + Dynamic port set: ??(Any candidate solution?) > > AFAIK, the 'draft-cui-softwire-host-4over6' doesn't mention IPv4 address > sharing. Is that correct? > > cheers, > --satoru > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
