+1 On 7/30/11 9:26 AM, "Peng Wu" <wea...@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn> wrote:
>Hi Gang, > >>Before making such comparison (of course it should be as fair as >>possible), >>I think we need to state what solution space we are targeting and what >>category mode we should take care. >>If I understand correctly, I would paraphrase as following categories. >> >>a) Stateful+Dynamic port sets: e.g. DS-Lite >>b) Stateful+Static port set: e.g. draft-cui-softwire-host-4over6-06 >>c) Stateless + Static port set: e.g. 4rd, 4via6 translation >>d) Stateless + Dynamic port set: ??(Any candidate solution?) > >I would say that the last one makes no sense > >_______________________________________________ >Softwires mailing list >Softwires@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires