One clarification. On 2011/07/29, at 10:18, GangChen wrote:
> Before making such comparison (of course it should be as fair as possible), > I think we need to state what solution space we are targeting and what > category mode we should take care. > If I understand correctly, I would paraphrase as following categories. > > a) Stateful+Dynamic port sets: e.g. DS-Lite > b) Stateful+Static port set: e.g. draft-cui-softwire-host-4over6-06 > c) Stateless + Static port set: e.g. 4rd, 4via6 translation > d) Stateless + Dynamic port set: ??(Any candidate solution?) AFAIK, the 'draft-cui-softwire-host-4over6' doesn't mention IPv4 address sharing. Is that correct? cheers, --satoru _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
