Dear Reinaldo, > I like it. Nice and clean diagram.
Thanks. > I believe NAT64& 'provision of additional IP address and port ranges' > should be 'yes'. NAT64 uses a IPv4 NAT pool much like NAT444 and needs to > support all the bells and whistles...APP, EIM, HP, PB, etc > > Same goes for " Requirements for provision of additional IPv4 addresses and > port ranges" and "NAT64". I believe it should be 'none' since it is > automatic. Of course, that's true, my mistake. I already fixed it and reuploaded it so there's an updaten version online already. Thanks! Nejc _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
