This could be a separate table. The good thing about this table is that is clean and focused.
On 8/12/11 7:08 AM, "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Nejc, > > Good table indeed. > > If you could add few more service related impact due to other features such as > UPNP inside home, DPI in the network, L4 QoS in the network, L4-aware routing > etc., then it would be quite insightful. I may also help you with that. > > Cheers, > Rajiv > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf >> Of Simon Perreault >> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:01 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Softwires] Clarification of the stateles/stateful discussion >> >> On 2011-08-11 16:00, Nejc Škoberne wrote: >>> The PDF document: http://nejc.skoberne.net/transfer/mechanisms.pdf >> >> VERY nice! >> >> One comment I would have is that maybe colour could be used to indicate >> good/bad instead of yes/no. >> >> Then we just pick the column with the less red on it and we're done. ;) >> >> Simon >> -- >> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca >> NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca >> STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
