Nejc, Good table indeed.
If you could add few more service related impact due to other features such as UPNP inside home, DPI in the network, L4 QoS in the network, L4-aware routing etc., then it would be quite insightful. I may also help you with that. Cheers, Rajiv > -----Original Message----- > From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Simon Perreault > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:01 AM > To: softwires@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Softwires] Clarification of the stateles/stateful discussion > > On 2011-08-11 16:00, Nejc Škoberne wrote: > > The PDF document: http://nejc.skoberne.net/transfer/mechanisms.pdf > > VERY nice! > > One comment I would have is that maybe colour could be used to indicate > good/bad instead of yes/no. > > Then we just pick the column with the less red on it and we're done. ;) > > Simon > -- > DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca > NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca > STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
